View Full Version : Why wasnt there a Warriors 2?
2gud4u
09-23-2006, 03:28 AM
I mean why not, i enjoyed the warriors so much, why not a second one?
Theres definetly some room for one,based probably on Ajax's escape from jail and the retrievil of Cleons body (these of course are just rumours) But a new rockstar game using the same system was what everyone expected and its no surprise that Bully uses a part of that system. Why rockstar wont make another one,i dont know,why dont you send them an email and ask?
BloodArtist
09-23-2006, 04:11 PM
wait... the game or movie? thats the same as "Why wont theymake Manhunt 2?" i think its because they just want to make a good game, not every game needs a sequel you know..
I meant the game but good point AgentSmith
djrussell
09-23-2006, 05:45 PM
Yeah i gotta say I agree with Agent Smith.. plus i mean - if they did make a Warriors 2 - they'd have to create a whole new storyline.. plus, not many (if any) movie-to-game adaptions have sequals - unless the movies have sequals.
bully15
09-25-2006, 07:28 AM
like i had said before...
one game thats based on a movie would be retarded to have a part 2 cus it based on the movie
Sandnick
09-26-2006, 04:30 AM
It's funny. The game has so much more to it than the movie, which says a lot in terms of how video games have surpassed movies. The movie (still a favorite in my DVD player) relied on action and suspense, but the game gave life and an entire world to a game. Is a sequel necessary? Yes, but only because since the truce is off, the Warriors might rise up to be the tougher gang over the Riffs.
vBulletin® v3.7.2, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.